Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Movie Review: Vertigo (1958)


Vertigo is considered an Alfred Hitchcock classic and is one of the best movies made in history of cinema. It is a psychological thriller directed and produced by Alfred Hitchcock.


The story is about detective John Scottie Ferguson (James Stewart) who has fear of heights. John retires from his profession after a police chase results in his partner falling from the roof due to his fear from height.
The next day, a college friend of John, Gavin Elster (Tom Helmore) asks him for a favor. He asks him to follow his wife Madeleine (Kim Novak) and find out to where she goes, not that he doubts her faithfulness but he suspects that she is being possessed by someone.

 He follows her and finds out that she is constantly hinting about her being possessed by Carlotta Valdes, in the graveyard she was staring at Carlotta Valdes’s grave, at a palace she was staring at Carlotta’s portrait. He learns from a book store owner that Carlotta Vandes had committed suicide after having left out by her husband who also kept her child with him. From Elster he learns that Carlotta Vandes his wife’s great grandmother. He also learns that her possession of Carlotta was not due to obsession, in fact she never had heard about Carlotta. 


The next day he again follows her to the bay and sees her instantly jumping into the water after throwing away the flowers she bought. He jumps into the bay and saves her. He takes her to his home and lays her on bed. When she wakes up, they talk and he inquires about her being found in the bay. They meet again the next day and he takes her to show old evergreen trees grown big, she later on tells him about the other world she often drifts into after her fits return. The next day she again comes to see him and tells him about the old San Francisco sites that keep haunting her. 


He takes her to those places and tries to research more and more into Carlotta’s past in order to cure her. Her fits again seem to return when she faces an urge to go to church, he after seeing the height of the church, follows her there, he sees her climbing the stairs, he follows her but stops at a point where he remembers he has fear of height. He sees the girl’s body falling down from the window. Although the jury passes the verdict that Madeleine’s committing suicide was the result of her mental illness, he is driven by guilt of not having saved the women.

 He constantly dreams about Carlotta’s necklace that Madeleine used to wear. Eventually he drives into the hotel room where Madeleine used to stay and meets Judy Barton who looks like Madeleine. She shows him her identity proof and domicile after a lot of convincing. He then asks her to have dinner with him just to remind himself of his love that he lost. She agrees. Now the suspense is revealed that the girl who ran on the stairs of the church was Judy and the girl who was thrown down from the ledge was the wife of Elster. It was Elster’s plan to kill his wife. She thinks about writing a letter to John explaining him about his plan but out of anxiety and fear of losing his love forever, she tears the letter. John and Judy start to love each other. John convinces Judy to dress like Madeleine. When he sees her wearing Carlotta’s necklace, he deduces that she is the actual girl who ran up to the church stairs. He takes her to the same church and forcefully takes her up the stairs while reciting her and Elster’s complete plan, he faces his phobia of height again and again but somehow overcomes it with his anger. When they reach the crime site, she tells him that she actually loves him and begs for forgiveness, in the meantime a nun appears at the spot, Judy while kissing John, almost startled by the sudden distraction by the nun, steps backward and falls from the church building to her death. The nun terrified by the site rings the mission bell and a startled John stands on the ledge in horror.

The movie was too long and thus became slow at some parts but that is acceptable considering the long screenplay movies which were made at that time. The suspense shown in the movie was thrilling and the story was it’s biggest plus point. No doubt Alfred Hitchcock is considered the master of suspense.
The best thing about the movie was that the suspense in that film was very entertaining and at the same time did not require too much brain to understand, this quality lacks in movies made nowadays. I believe that if a director is unable to explain his movie properly, it is the result of poor direction. I hold this case true for the movie Prestige. It required me one repetition and an hour of internet research to understand the film. The concept was excellent but the director failed to convey it to the audience properly.

It is after a long time that I watched a classic and happy to have chosen Vertigo.

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Movie Review: Bobby Jasoos


Whenever people talk about detectives, the image of James Bond, Sherlock Holmes, Feluda etc popup in our mind. Bollywood has started to treat the subject from a different angle, it started with Joe B Carvalho which was a disaster, and actually it deserved to be a disaster. Before that there was Barfi too, it was not exactly a spy flick but still a little bit detective touch was there but that film was also criticized for more than half of the scenes copied from Charlie Chaplin and Jackie Chan films. Now the latest entry into this race is the movie which I am going to talk about today.



 The story is set in Hyderabad. A small time private detective (Vidya Balan) who aspires to work in a private detective firm pursues her spying passion by solving neighborhood cases of little account. Her name is Bilqis Ahmed popularly referred to as Bobby Jasoos. She has least interest in household work and therefore is most of the time neglected by her father. What drives the story is the one chance she gets when a man named Anees Khan (Kiran Kumar) approaches her and offers her huge amount of money to find a girl. He doesn’t provide her any solid identity of the girl except a birthmark. She enthusiastically takes up the case and finds her, after this he offers her more amount to find another girl, and this is how the story proceeds giving the audience a twist at the end. Do not be too enthusiastic about it because the twist is not too much unexpected kind of. The story also has a touch of romance and emotions but I am sure that’s not exactly what audience is looking for; still, seeing the storyline, the emotional touch was a necessity.

This is the most easy going decent detective comedy which although has a villain angle but does not actually have a villain. It is one of those movies for which you can hold your patience and wait for it to air on television or subscribe on DTH. The movie does not have a very good storyline but the storyline is not bad either. A decent one time watch which entertains you at some moments, that’s what the movie is.

Vidya Balan was excellent in her character, she is a middle class unmarried girl who aspires to make it big; in all her looks that she possesses, be it the Jyotishi who reads palm for free, a bangle seller, student etc she was perfect throughout. Ali Fazal as Tasavur, Bobby’s friend who eventually falls in love with her, was also justified for his character. All the others specifically including Kiran Kumar as Anees Khan, Arjan Bajwa as Lala and Rajendra Gupta as Bobby’s father were great with their characters.  


Final advice, this movie is a decent watch for all those who are brain licked by watching Joe B Carvalho. This film is ten times better than that. The comedy is funny though not too much tickling but at the same time the writers and directors had not taken the help of illogical situations and characters.

If you all have seen this movie do let me know your opinion and to rate my review, visit this link 

Sunday, July 6, 2014

Movie Review: Raging Bull (1980)


When I was small I used sports like boxing and wrestling as a means of excuse to beat my friends or pick a fight with them. My parents used to stop us and lie that everything shown in there is false, was it really false? I used to wonder. If I had seen Raging Bull at that age, provided that I also know it’s a true story, I would have had known the actual truth.

Yes, Raging Bull, released in 1980 and directed by Martin Scorcese  was a true story about a boxer named Jake La Motta who was also known as “The Raging Bull” and “The Bronx Bull”. The film was adapted by Mardik Martin and Paul Schrader into a screenplay from Jake La Motta’s memoir ‘Raging Bull: My story’.
The film starts with showing an aging and overweight Jake La Motta practicing a comedic routine. The rest of the film then shows in flashbacks starting from his first loss in 1941 from Jimmy Reeves to his arrest in 1958 for introducing underage girls to men in a club he owned in Miami. The movie basically shows the character of Jake La Motta, his relations with his brother Joey La Motta and wife Vikki LaMotta. How he lost everything due to his rage and sexual jealousy was what this movie intended to convey.

 He hated it when he saw his wife talking to other people, and frequently slapped and scolded her. One of the important reasons for his victory in the ring was his jealous rage against his wife which he used to take out on his opponents, the most important being Tony Janiro whom he had brutally beaten up after his wife had made an offhand comment about him that he has a pretty face. His jealousy became more and more violent day after day, he started to slap her and beat her and eventually also started to suspect his own brother Joey La Motta to have had intimate relation with her.  After a long argument about this matter with Joey, which also forms an iconic scene of this film, Jake’s suspicion makes Vikki sarcastically shout that she had sex with Joey and other men, Jake brutally beats Joey up at his own house, in front of his wife and children, when Vikki tried to stop him, she was slapped too. He later regretted his action and was able to convince his wife about not leaving him but was alienated away by his brother. After defeating Laurent Dauthuille in 1950, he tries to make contact with his brother for reconciliation but to no success. By 1956, Jake and his family had moved to Miami where he has grown overweight, and owns a nightclub La Motta’s. 

After he stays out all night, Vickie informs him that she wants a divorce; he is later arrested for introducing underage girls to men in his club. He tries to bribe his way out by using the jewels from his championship belt but is jailed in 1957 after which he sorrowfully punches the wall and crying in despair over his misfortune. In 1958 he is back in New York and lands upon his brother Joey, he asks for forgiveness constantly; Joey elusively forgives him. The film cuts back to where it started and ends with a biblical quote.

There is no need to comment about the movie’s screenplay and Martin Scorcese’s direction, me not being a fan of sports also enjoyed the movie. The film stars one of the best actors in the history of cinema, Robert De Niro and one of my favorite comedians Joe Pesci. Needless to mention about Robert De Niro’s acting, and Joe Pesci as his brother succeeded to obtain himself the tag of one of the best supporting actors in history. I think somehow somewhere Martin Scorcese also knew that some of his characters can be best portrayed by Joe Pesci and now realize that his super hit collaboration with Robert De Niro in movies like Raging Bull, Casino and Goodfellas is incomplete without the support of Joe Pesci. 


Thursday, July 3, 2014

Movie Review: Angshumaner Chobi (2009)


This Tollywood movie which is also a debut film of Atanu Ghosh, features the story of four people, Angshuman, a director from Italy who comes to Kolkatta to make a movie; Madhura Sen, a onetime national award winning actress who now works in Jatra; Pradyut Mukhopadhyay, a depressed 72 year old man who was once a superstar but now has nightmares of his makeup man nagging him and Neel, a gigolo who is having an affair with Madhura Sen.



 Angshuman (Indraneil Sengupta) comes to India from Italy to direct his first project which is a biographical movie based on the life of a 72 year old celebrity painter who suffers from Dementia and his 31 year old nurse. People whom he wants to enact the lead roles at any cost are Pradyut Mukhopadhyay (Soumitra Chatterjee) and Madhura Sen (Indrani Halder). Pradyut Mukhopadhyay was a superstar of his time and now has chosen a life of exile, he does not wish to act in movies anymore. He frequently dreams of his makeup man nagging him and shouting that his part has finished thus he should wipe off his makeup.



Madhura Sen had won a national award in her debut film and because of her arrogance and tantrums; her career declined and now leads a life of frustration and acts for jatras. She has a secret affair with a gigolo named Neel (Tata Roy Choudhary), who is passionate about dancing and astronomy.




Madhura and her husband Sudip, who was once her big fan, have no contact with each other, yet they are not divorced. Madhura receives news of Sudip committing suicide; CID crime branch officer Sourya (Ananya Chatterjee) suspects it to be a case of homicide. Angshuman in the meantime seeing all this is still determined about making his film.



Every fresh filmmaker has to struggle to make his first feature film, what kind of struggle they go through may vary. In this movie, it is shown what kind of struggle Angshuman, a young director who studied filmmaking in Italy has to go through to make his first feature film in Kolkatta. Firstly he had to convince yesteryear’s superstar Pradyut to come out of his lonely life and start acting, then he had to convince Madhura, who signed for the script easily but her brief conflict with Pradyut, and then her husband’s murder case, her affair with a gigolo and her tantrums were obstacles on his way towards the completion of his film shoot. It was not just Angshuman’s story, whatever obstacles occurred from Pradyut, Madhura and Neel’s sides were a part of their own sufferings.
The direction and writing style is a mix of genres capturing emotion, little bit humor, thriller and tragedy. It is one of those movies which someone would watch only once but then that onetime watch for him will be necessary. With a powerful story, the movie also has powerful star cast with actors like the legendary Soumitra Chatterjee, Tata Roy Choudhary, Indraneil  Sen Gupta and Ananya Chatterjee along with special appearances from Bengali film industry’s renowned artists like Sabyasachi Chakravorty, Rudranil Ghosh and Kaushik Sen.

To rate my review, visit this link .

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Movie Review: Grace of Monaco


Produced by Uday Chopra of YRF studios and Arash Amel, who is also the writer of this movie, Grace of Monaco shows the life of actress Kelly Grace after her marriage with Prince of Monaco, Rainer III. At that time there had been a dispute between France’s Charles De Gaulle and Prince Rainer III, at the very time she was also considering returning to Hollywood to star in Alfred Hitchcock’s film Marnie.


Grace Kelly’s (Nicole Kidman) married life with Prince Rainer III (Tim Roth)  was not a very pleasurable one, her husband is busy most of the time and due to the dispute between Monaco’s Rainer III and France’s Charles De Gaulle, the prince was already distressed. She realizes that the royal family of Monaco stress more on luxuries and politics than family and as a naïve, everything she says have consequences hence she is told to say nothing at all by the Prince. During the same time director Alfred Hitchcock also proposes her to return to Hollywood with his next movie Marnie. She at first refuses but later considers doing that film. 




Prince at first is supportive but the council members oppose her decision fearing that it may result in studio publicizing the movie in their name to which Grace’s publicist assures them that Alfred Hitchcock has agreed about not publicizing the film in their name. They agree and decide to keep it a secret for time being; however someone from the family leaks the news to the newspapers. Although Grace is eager but due to public outcry, tells Hitchcock that needs some time to decide whether she would do that movie or not.  She decides to investigate the matter herself.  Deciding not to be naïve anymore, Kelly starts to learn customs and traditions of being the princess of Monaco; she takes personal French tuitions and learns about the historical importance of Monaco. Grace Kelly finally rejects doing Alfred Hitchcock’s Marnie. Later she suspects that countess is the traitor and spots her meeting a French detective. Much later Rainer and Grace learn that Rainer’s own sister is the traitor who had hired the French detective and the countess to handover Monaco to Charles Gaulle so that she can take over the thrown as princess. In the end, people of Monaco accept Grace Kelly as their Princess.



The movie only has the power of star cast, apart from this; I can’t find any reason to recommend it. The objective to show a particular scene in the movie had not been properly conveyed. Firstly I don’t understand why such a story has been adopted into a screenplay in the first place, I mean it’s not like Grace Kelly had a very extraordinary story or something. She was an actress and had difficulty in adjusting to the royal family, that’s it. The public outcry due to her return in movies gave her the need to behave like a princess. And at the same time the conflict and conspiracies happening which were not necessarily true because when the movie starts, it’s written that it is a fictional account of the life of Grace Kelly.




Overall, there’s no point watching this movie. If you have already seen this movie and have a different opinion then do let me know in comments. If you want to rate my review then go to this link